Here is a counterintuitive truth about website speed: faster isn't always better.
In a recent episode of The Frictionless Experience, Nick and I explored the complexities of website performance, and challenged the long-standing “2 second rule” for website speed.
When most people think about website performance, they tend to focus almost exclusively on speed. After all, we've all seen the statistics—one second of lag time can cost Amazon $1.6 billion in sales, and Walmart experiences a sharp decline in conversions if their site slows down.
These kinds of statements have made site speed an almost sacred element of the user experience (UX) conversation.
But here's the reality: speed without stability can harm user experience more than help it.
A fast site is good, but what happens when that speed comes at the expense of images loading improperly, links breaking, or worse, parts of the site not rendering at all? As Nick pointed out, "Fast is better only when it's stable."
That sets the stage for a deeper understanding of website performance.
At its core, website speed is just one component of an overall user experience. What matters more is reliability. Imagine loading a lightning-fast website, but the images you expect don't appear. Sure, the page may have technically loaded in under a second, but what is the user's perception when they don't get what they expected?
Nick emphasized that focusing only on speed can lead to other crucial areas being neglected, such as image quality or navigation elements:
This idea is central to understanding that user expectations go beyond speed—they include quality and completeness of the experience. It's not enough for a website to load quickly if it doesn't function well. Whether it's product images not loading, videos failing to stream, or checkout buttons becoming unclickable, these failures directly translate into lost customers.
One of the most fascinating parts of our discussion was a case study involving a travel booking website. When the company initially optimized its site, it focused heavily on speed, prioritizing faster load times by compressing images and other elements. However, they noticed an unexpected dip in conversions.
As I noted during the episode, the reduced image quality actually led to fewer bookings. The company's target audience, looking to book hotels and resorts, valued high-quality visuals over speed. Users wanted to see detailed pictures of the rooms, amenities, and overall ambiance of the property, and lower-quality images detracted from their decision-making process.
"They tested various speeds and found they needed higher quality imagery," I explained. "If they sped it up with lower quality images, they actually reduced conversions."
This case perfectly illustrates the idea that performance optimization is not a one-size-fits-all solution. In some cases, focusing too much on speed can backfire, especially if it compromises key elements of the user journey that are crucial for conversions.
In the world of website performance, not all experiences are created equal. Different pages and functions on a site may have varying levels of importance when it comes to speed and performance. For example, a page where a user checks their order status may not require the same level of speed as the checkout page itself.
"Certain experiences on your site may need performance more than others," Nick explained during the episode. For example, at the bottom of the funnel (when users are about to make a purchase), speed is crucial. However, if someone is browsing or in the early stages of the decision-making process, they may be more willing to endure a slower experience, provided the quality of information is high.
Consider hotel bookings again. Users on these sites are not just browsing—they're making decisions about where they'll stay on their next vacation. A blurry or low-resolution image of a hotel room could be enough to dissuade them from making a booking, even if the rest of the page loads quickly. I summarized this when he said:
The biggest takeaway from our conversation? Performance optimization isn't just a race against the clock. In fact, approaching it that way can lead to missed opportunities for enhancing other crucial aspects of the customer experience.
What truly matters is understanding your users, their expectations, and the context of their journey. As I said during the episode, "Your customer may have a different expectation than Amazon's customers or Walmart's customers." This highlights the importance of tailoring your performance strategies based on the unique needs of your audience rather than blindly following industry-wide benchmarks.
It's easy to fall into the trap of believing that faster is always better. Many site owners see speed as the ultimate goal, often citing studies that link faster load times with higher conversion rates. While these stats are valid in certain contexts, they don't tell the whole story.
What's missing from the conversation is the nuance of user experience, specific use cases, and customer journey mapping. Some users may prioritize speed, while others—particularly those making high-stakes purchases like booking a hotel or buying expensive electronics—may be willing to wait a few extra seconds for a richer experience.
"Fast is good, but only if it's accompanied by stability and quality," Nick emphasized. Without both, the user experience falls apart, regardless of how quickly your site loads.
So, how do you move beyond blanket statements about speed? It all comes down to measurement.
Understanding the true value of speed for your specific audience requires data. Nick pointed out that each user journey should be measured independently:
Different user journeys demand different experiences, and the definition of success varies depending on the context. A returning customer checking an order status may have more patience than a new customer trying to complete a purchase. Recognizing these differences allows you to optimize in ways that truly matter to your audience.
The key message from our discussion? Speed is just one piece of the puzzle. While it's undeniably important, it's not the only factor that contributes to a great user experience. Stability, quality, and context are equally crucial, if not more so.
Blindly chasing faster load times without considering these other elements can lead to a subpar experience for your users. Instead, the goal should be to create a balanced, frictionless experience that meets the specific needs of your audience.
To put it simply, don't optimize for speed in isolation. Optimize for the experience as a whole, understanding that what works for one audience or one site may not work for another. Performance optimization is about much more than cutting milliseconds off load times—it's about creating a site that delights your users, no matter how long it takes to load.
So, what's your take? Have you encountered situations where the pursuit of speed conflicted with other crucial aspects of user experience?